24 Mar 2026

To succeed, West Midlands start-ups must focus on founder readiness

Rupert Lyle, Future Planet Capital’s regional investment director and fund principal of West Midlands Co-Investment Fund (WMCO), is looking at the region’s investment landscape and encouraging founders to focus on readiness over speed in order to give their businesses, and themselves, the best chance at success.

Rupert Lyle

The West Midlands doesn’t need more startups; quantity has never been our constraint. The problem we’re experiencing does not lie with the number of founders who want to turn their passion into a business.

What does need addressing is the capital culture that seems to reward haste and punish those who carefully consider, leading to founder burn-out and the knock-on impact on the business that founder worked so hard to build.

Across the West Midlands, founder support has never been stronger, yet founder readiness remains one of the most overlooked risks in building successful companies.

When we talk about investment and portfolios in the UK, people tend to think of London as the centre of it all. And while there is huge amounts of investment there, there is also fierce competition.

The West Midlands, however, is a fantastic place to grow a business, it offers founders strong investment opportunities and support programmes designed to nurture high-growth businesses, with a more personal approach.

Programmes from the region’s leading universities, Innovation Birmingham, Innovate UK and private accelerators combine to form a credible, functioning ecosystem, not a satellite outpost.

And yet, while these programmes build strong businesses, founder readiness requires more than polished pitch decks and detailed financial models. It demands founders who are emotionally and structurally prepared to carry the weight of building world-class companies from the West Midlands, without needing to relocate to be taken seriously or to raise capital.

 

Lonely at the top

Raising funds is not a spreadsheet exercise, it is psychological endurance and the real test is the resilience of the person at the helm. We see this play out repeatedly.

Starting a business is an exciting prospect, but remaining steady while leading one is another matter altogether.

Being a founder is a lonely role, there is an immense amount of responsibility, uncertainty and isolation which I don't think is always completely recognised or fully understood by those at the helm of start-ups.

When we talk about investment, we tend to focus on concepts, valuations and forecasts.

What we rarely do is interrogate whether the founder is equipped to carry the psychological load that capital introduces. The emotional costs of accessing that capital cannot, and should not, be underestimated. Yet it still is.

Decision-making during uncertainty and the resilience to process rejection and endless scrutiny can - and often do - take their toll.

Leading a company through ambiguity and scrutiny is not a soft concern, it is a material business risk. In fact, founder sustainability under prolonged pressure is one of the most overlooked risk factors in company failure. This makes it systemic, not personal.

This is a significant point of failure that needs to be recognised and understood in order to be addressed. Thomas Edison said, “Vision without execution is hallucination”...and too many founders have no idea how to execute.

When the mental load is ignored, it shows up later as poor decisions, founder burnout, or failed companies. This is not about personal weakness, it's about leadership preparedness in extreme conditions.

If the region wants to build durable, meaningful businesses, we must redesign how we prepare founders, deploy capital, and guide growth.

 

Regional funding gap

London is a fully functioning ecosystem in its own right. There’s more capital, more startups, more investors, more advisers, more everything. In sectors like fintech, that creates momentum and the whole system feeds itself.

The regions are very different. There’s less capital, fewer venture firms, fewer deals, and more silos. That makes it harder for founders to get backing and harder for ecosystems to mature properly.

For context, Hungary has roughly the same size economy as the West Midlands and has around 37 venture capital firms. The West Midlands has two. That tells you there’s a structural funding gap.

Funds like the West Midlands Co-Investment Fund exist to help unlock more capital locally and support founders who might otherwise struggle to access funding.

 

The West Midlands ecosystem

Across the region, founders are typically purpose- and passion-driven, building businesses rooted in place, meaning, and durability. Many are not optimising for fast exits, but for long-term value. Admirable, but not without tension.

Deep emotional investment in a mission can make delegation harder. Control feels safer than expansion.

Unlike rapid-scale startups built to flip quickly, many regional founders hold the reins tightly…sometimes beyond the point of strategic sense.

Capital and policy must align with this reality, rather than forcing founders into misfit models that undermine both ambition and outcomes.

We need to structure investment in a way that meets the specific needs of the founders and offers the bespoke support required.

This is where I believe the region has the opportunity to differentiate itself. As a smaller ecosystem, we have the ability and resources to support and guide founders on the journey and offer our decades of experience as they navigate their way through the initial stages of their business.

 

Emotional resilience under pressure

Being ‘ready’ to secure investment and elevate a new business can often be misunderstood as having a compelling pitch, data modelling and eager founders. That is only ‘entry level’ readiness.

True readiness includes the ability to make sound decisions under pressure, absorb frequent rejection, and maintain leadership clarity as expectations intensify.

Founders must realise that doing everything themselves is not heroic, it is structurally inefficient. This is about leadership capabilities, not personality traits. The ability to admit limits, appoint world-class people, and share responsibility is a defining factor in founder durability.

Strong teams reduce founder isolation, improve decision quality and materially increase investor confidence. Leadership is not about carrying the weight alone; it is about building the capacity to carry it as a collective.

 

Train the advisors, not just the founders

Emotional preparedness must be embedded all the way through the investment ecosystem. Programmes should focus on investor psychology, emotional readiness, leadership under pressure and rejection dynamics. These are daily realities for founders, and the ecosystem must prepare them accordingly.

Founders do not often fail in isolation; poor guidance is a systemic issue that contributes to this failure.

Advisors, programme hosts and growth hubs need to ensure they recognise founders who are being pushed into growth or fundraising before they have the leadership capacity or team structure to sustain it.

Rewarding speed over readiness, even where intentions across the ecosystem are positive, increases the risk of founder burnout and business failure.

 

Aligning capital with founder intent

Often, securing capital can become the primary objective. It should not be. Founders must be empowered to choose capital that aligns with their timescale, values and ambition…and to say no when it does not.

Alignment preserves trust, reduces downstream friction and builds healthier companies over the long term.

Ultimately, the founders need more long-horizon, founder-aligned capital willing to accept longer holding periods and that values durability over speed.

We need patient capital built for extended journeys that focuses on long-term company building, not high-speed growth and swift exits.

If we want to build globally competitive companies from the West Midlands, founder readiness must become a regional priority - not an afterthought.